FatherGarage.com

(Harry Hamburg – AP)

“This is a very special month for us because one year ago we passed the historic Affordable Health Care Act, which has made a difference in the lives of the American people.”

— House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)

House Democrats held a birthday party last week for passage of the health-care law. Just as we looked at Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s floor speech noting the milestone, we will now examine some of the claims made by Democrats.

McConnell framed his speech in negative terms, citing data to back up his language. Both Democrats and Republicans can pick and choose numbers and studies to make their case, but we found that generally McConnell did not exaggerate or use bogus figures. In fact, he correctly described a Congressional Budget Office analysis suggesting a potential reduction in employment of 800,000 jobs (technically, one-half of 1 percent of household employment in 2021) that other Republicans have misrepresented.

By contrast, House Democrats appear to show little hesitation about repeating claims that previously have found to be false or exaggerated. So let’s take a tour through the numbers.

“It’s about jobs. Does it create jobs? Health insurance reform creates 4 million jobs, and in the last 12 months the private sector has added 1.5 million new jobs, and of that a quarter of a million were in the health insurance industry.”

— Pelosi

Here, Pelosi is repeating a talking point from the health-care debate. The 4 million figure comes from a report by the Center for American Progress, a liberal-leaning group, which estimated that universal health care would add 250,000 to 400,000 jobs a year. Pelosi took the top end of the range and then multiplied it by 10, a numerical sleight-of-hand that Polifact last year labeled “half true.”

A Pelosi spokesman noted she has been using this statistic for 14 months now, but we frown on the reuse of statistics previously found to be suspect.

In this case, since the bill has passed, the Congressional Budget Office has done its own analysis (the one McConnell cited) that cast some doubt on the CAP analysis, written before the bill was passed into law. Presumably, members of Congress should pay more attention to estimates by their own budget agency than think tanks that promote their agenda. Repeating this dubious statistic is worth at least a Pinocchio or two. (About our rating scale)

The second half of her statement comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but it doesn’t really mean anything. Health-care jobs have long been an important part of new private-sector jobs, so 260,000 being created in the last 12 months is not out of the ordinary. For example, BLS figures show that in 2007, there were 381,000 health care jobs created; in 2006, 324,000 jobs; and in 2005, 271,000 jobs. The CAP study was not making any prediction about health-care jobs, but all jobs, so it is unclear what point Pelosi is making with this statistic.

 “It’s about reducing the deficit. Again, it reduces the deficit more than $1 trillion over the life of the bill.”

— Pelosi

This is another bogus statistic for which we have previously awarded three Pinocchios.

The CBO estimated $143 billion in deficit reduction over 10 years in the health-care law, but about $19 billion of it came from unrelated items. As we have noted, the remaining $124 billion was based on a number of assumptions that called that estimate into question.

But Pelosi claims more than $1 trillion in deficit reduction by using a 20-year figure that is particularly absurd.

 As we wrote in January: “There are too many uncertainties to be precise, and the CBO itself merely offered a tentative guess of a “broad range of around one-half percent of GDP,” with significant caveats. Democrats simply took that percentage, multiplied it against the predicted size of the GDP 20 years from now (itself a pretty fuzzy figure) and, presto, they had a number. But it’s a fairly meaningless one.”

 “In fact, when you look at the percentage of employers with 10 employees or less that offer health care, it rose from 46 percent in 2009, and it went up to 59 percent in 2010, at the end of last year, an incredible increase that we have. That shows that it is working.”

— Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Tex.)

Another three-Pinocchio statistic! We also picked this apart in January so we are surprised this golden oldie is still in use by Democrats.

The statistic comes from a Kaiser Family Foundation survey that was largely conducted before the health care bill was passed, so it is pretty irrelevant. Moreover, the study said the main reason for the shift was not because more companies were offering health insurance but because more that did not were going out of business.

 Gary Claxton, the main author of the report, also told us that the data set for small firms — the one Cuellar cited — was too tiny to reach any conclusions.

So, rather than showing that the health care law is “working,” the survey that is the source of this statistic does not show that at all.

 Jose Borjon, a spokesman for Cuellar, said in an e-mail: “Thank you for bringing your January 19, 2011, Washington Post Fact Checker article to our attention.  Congressman Cuellar based his quote from a December 27, 2010, Los Angeles Times story by Noam Levey. Thank you for bringing to light the correct characterization of the Kaiser employer survey. Nevertheless, stories across the country, from North Carolina to Kansas, demonstrate that small businesses are increasingly taking advantage of the small business tax credit to provide health care to their employees.”

The Times article does provide anecdotal evidence that health insurance companies are aggressively marketing a small-business tax credit in the law to sign up new customers. Still, Democrats need to drop this ”fact” from their talking points.

Follow the Fact Checker on Twitter and friend us on Facebook

???initialComments:true! pubdate:03/21/2011 06:00 EDT! commentPeriod:3! commentEndDate:3/24/11 6:0 EDT! currentDate:3/22/11 1:30 EDT! allowComments:true! displayComments:false!

View the original article here

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Senator Lisa Murkowski is back, but that does not mean she is on message.

The Republican senator from Alaska, who recaptured her seat in November though a write-in campaign, told an Anchorage television reporter that while she would vote to repeal the health care overhaul in the unlikely event that such a bill hit the Senate floor, she is not sure that the Republicans in that body should be talking about it.

“We’re in a situation where there’s some messaging going on,” said Ms. Murkowski, during an interview with KTVA-TV, in an apparent reference to the Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell’s announcement that the Senate would take up the repeal bill passed this week in the House, in spite of the fact that Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, had already said in a one-word news release that the chances of such a vote were “unlikely.”

Ms. Murkowski pointed out that there were probably not enough votes in the Senate — where Democrats have lost strength but remain in the majority — to pass a repeal of the law, and said that President Obama would never get on board with it, either.

“I think we’ve got to get rid of it,” she said in reference to the health care overhaul, but added, “What I don’t think people want is the kind of messaging that’s going on,” by referring to a vote that would likely not come to fruition.

Further, she said: “If we end it and do nothing else, we haven’t helped out a single American family out there. If we get rid of it and say, ‘O.K., you’re all on your own,’ we’re worse off than when we started these discussions.”

View the original article here

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

In Today’s Times:

– As the Senate prepares to vote this week on the New Start nuclear arms treaty with Russia, the White House may have to fight to keep enough lawmakers on board to gain ratification. The Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, announced his opposition to the treaty on Sunday. Peter Baker and David Herszenhorn write that the big question now is whether and how aggressively Mr. McConnell will lobby members of his caucus to oppose the treaty, and whether lawmakers who unsuccessfully opposed repealing the military’s ban on openly gay service members will withdraw their support for the nuclear pact.

– After winning a repeal of the military policy known as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” activists  — especially the press watchdog Media Matters — are shifting their energies to fight for same-sex marriage, Sheryl Stolberg writes.

– John Harwood runs through the legislative victories that Senator Harry Reid has won as majority leader. He also asks whether the tax deal that lawmakers passed last week could serve as a template for bipartisanship in the next Congress, when Republicans take the reins of the House.

–Kate Zernike picks up on efforts by opponents of the Democrats’ health care overhaul to push an amendment to the Constitution that would allow two-thirds of the 50 state legislature to repeal any act of Congress. The proposed amendment ultimately “must be approved by both chambers of Congress — requiring them to agree, in this case, to check their own power — and then by three-quarters of, or 38, state legislatures.”

–Eric Pfanner draws lessons from Google and Britain to warn of the downsides of a potential American prosecution of Julan Assange, concluding, “This is one war in which most of the collateral damage would be American.”

Around the Web:

–In what The Hill calls a “Sunday-evening surprise,” the Senate passed a long-delayed food safety bill by unanimous consent, sending the legislation back to the House for final passage.

–The Obama administration is nearing a border security deal with Canada that will address the screening of people crossing the border, examining cargo leaving foreign ports bound for the United States or Canada, and increasing information-sharing and intelligence cooperation, according to The Globe and Mail (via The Wall Street Journal).

–For a preview of how the House and Senate leadership will work together in the next Congress, Congressional Quarterly points to the two disparate schedules released by Mr. Reid and Representative Eric Cantor, the incoming House majority leader.

–Representative Peter King wrote in Newsday that he plans to hold hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims and homegrown terrorism when he takes over the House Committee on Homeland Security. But the head of the Council on American-Islamic Relations told The Associated Press he’s concerned that the hearings might become a witch hunt.

–Republicans may be taking over the House in January after handing Democrats a 63-seat loss, but Representative Steve Israel, Democrat of New York and chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told The Washington Post that he’s confident the party can win the 25 seats needed to regain control in 2012.

–The Hill reports that Senators Charles E. Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, both New York Democrats, have struck a deal with Republicans to pass a health care bill for emergency responders and nearby residents sickened or injured as a result of the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. The bill could come up for a vote this week, and would need final approval from the House.

–CQ has the list of high-profile nominees to the Obama administration who await confirmation with three weeks to go in the lame-duck session.

–The Hill also notes that earmark requests are becoming an early scourge in undeclared and nascent 2012 Senate campaigns.

View the original article here

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

The high-profile White House meeting Thursday night between President Obama and the newly empowered Republican leadership isn’t going to happen. Rep. John Boehner, the House speaker in waiting, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell asked for a continuance — which was granted. The White House said the get-together — ostensibly planned to talk about the [...]

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says Senate Republicans can be “willing partners” with President Obama on some issues if the president wants to rein in federal spending and promote job growth in the private sector. In an interview Friday with the Wall Street Journal, McConnell chose his words carefully but took a more constructive tone [...]

Republican leaders are sounding like men with a mandate. Sweeping House gains and new governorships in nine key swing states in the 2012 presidential election will do that for a party. “We are determined to stop the agenda Americans have rejected and to turn this ship around,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said. So what, [...]