With House Republicans planning to approve a bill on Wednesday that would repeal the big health care overhaul, Democrats on Tuesday ramped up their efforts to defend the law.
The secretary of health and human services, Kathleen Sebelius, will hold a news conference on Tuesday morning to discuss a report by her agency showing that as many as 129 million Americans under age 65 have some pre-existing medical condition that could lead them to be denied health insurance coverage without protections included in the new law.
“Under the full range of policies in the Affordable Care Act to be in place by 2014, Americans living with pre-existing conditions are free from discrimination,” the assistant secretary of health and human services for public affairs, Richard Sorian, wrote in a blog post.
Mr. Sorian, in his post, also insisted that thanks to the law, Americans with pre-existing conditions “can get the health coverage they need at a price they can afford.”
That, of course, remains to be seen given that the main provisions of the law, including subsidies to help eligible uninsured Americans purchase coverage, do not begin until 2014. Even some supporters of the law have questioned if the subsidies will be sufficient to make insurance affordable.
Later on Tuesday, Representatives Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida and Joseph Crowley of New York, working with the Democratic National Committee, will hold another news conference to make the case that repealing the health care law would be “devastating” for the American public.
The two representatives will be joined by “individuals with personal stories of how they’ve benefitted from the Affordable Care Act.”
“Insurance companies would be free to pursue their profits without any accountability, leaving people with fewer choices, fewer options, and little recourse,” the Democrats said in a press release. “The effort by Republicans would allow insurance companies to discriminate against and deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions, cancel coverage when families get sick, and limit the amount of care Americans can get when they need it the most. Repeal would not only allow health insurance costs to continue to soar, but would kill tax credits that help small businesses offer employee health insurance coverage and the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program — which provides financial assistance for employer health plans offered to early retirees. The American public cannot afford to revert back to a health care system that does not have their best interest in mind. This press call will highlight the devastating affects repeal of the ACA will have on the American people and why we must protect the progress we’ve made.”
The new House Republican majority has made repeal of the health care law one of its top priorities, even though Democrats who control the Senate say they have no intention of taking up the measure, and President Obama would certainly veto it.
Republicans say the law is overly intrusive, giving the government too much of a role in the health care system, and that it will prove far more expensive than Democrats and independent Congressional budget analysts have suggested.
On a third front, Representative Henry Waxman of California, the senior Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Representative Frank Pallone Jr., Democrat of New Jersey, released an analysis showing the potential effects of repealing the health care law in individual Congressional districts.
In a letter to colleagues, Mr. Waxman and Mr. Pallone criticized Republicans for not holding hearings about undoing the health care law. “We believe many members, especially newly elected ones, may be surprised by the results,” they wrote. “Health care reform is already delivering important health benefits to your constituents.”
January 18, 2011
Dear Colleague:
This week, we will be considering legislation to repeal the historic patients’ rights, protections, and benefits already in effect as a result of the historic health care law. To assist members in understanding the ramifications of repeal, we asked the minority staff of the Committee on Energy and Commerce to analyze the impacts of repeal in every congressional district in the country.
Today, we are releasing these analyses. We have also prepared analyses on the impact of repeal in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the country. The district-specific and metropolitan-area reports are online at http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/.
We believe many members, especially newly elected ones, may be surprised by the results. Health care reform is already delivering important health benefits to your constituents. As a result of the law, insurers have stopped discriminating against sick children in your district, seniors in your district are saving money on prescription drugs, small businesses in your district are receiving tax credits to provide health insurance, and insured individuals with individual or employer coverage are enjoying new rights and protections against insurance industry abuses. Repeal will roll back these benefits.
We regret that there have been no hearings on the implications of repeal. The failure to hold hearings denies members and the public an opportunity to understand fully what is at stake. This is especially a problem for freshmen members because they did not participate in any of the many hearings held last Congress prior to passage of the health reform law. Our Committee alone held over ten days of hearings and heard from over 100 witnesses before the House voted to enact health reform.
To give you an idea of what is at stake, here are some examples of the benefits the law provides in the districts of ten new members:
Protection for Individuals with Pre-Existing Conditions. Under the health reform law, insurance companies can no longer deny coverage to children with pre-existing conditions and will be banned from discriminating against adults with pre-existing conditions in 2014. Freshman Rep. Joe Walsh, from Illinois, represents a district that has 10,000 to 47,000 children with pre-existing conditions. Freshman Rep. Nan Hayworth from New York represents a district with 128,000 to 324,000 non-elderly residents with pre-existing conditions. If repeal passes, these children and adults lose the protection afforded by the law and could be denied individual policies by insurance companies.
Protection Against Coverage Rescissions. The health reform law prohibits insurers from rescinding coverage for individuals who become ill. Freshman Rep. Patrick Meehan from Pennsylvania represents a district in which 40,000 residents purchase individual health insurance. Repeal would allow insurance companies to resume the practice of rescinding their coverage after they get sick and need care.
Benefits for Young Adults. The health reform law allows young adults to remain on their parents’ insurance policies up to age 26. Freshman Rep. Daniel Webster from Florida represents 4,000 young adults who have or are expected to take advantage of this benefit. If repeal passes, these young adults would lose their coverage.
Closing the Donut Hole. Beginning in 2011, the health reform law provides a 50% discount for prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries who enter the Medicare Part D “donut hole” and lose coverage for their drug expenses. The law then increases the discount to Medicare beneficiaries each year until 2020, when the donut hole is finally eliminated. Freshman Rep. Allen B. West from Florida represents 15,000 Medicare beneficiaries who are expected to benefit from these provisions. Repeal would increase the average cost of prescription drugs for these seniors by over $500 in 2011 and over $3,000 in 2020.
Preventive Care and Other Benefits for Seniors. The health reform law improves Medicare by providing free preventive and wellness care, improving primary and coordinated care, and enhancing nursing home care. The law also strengthens the Medicare trust fund, extending its solvency from 2017 to 2029. Freshman Rep. Bill Johnson from Ohio represents 116,000 Medicare beneficiaries. Repeal would eliminate these benefits for the seniors in the district.
Tax Credits for Families. Starting in 2014, the health reform law gives tax credits to middle class families with incomes up to $88,000 for a family of four. Freshman Rep. Reid Ribble from Wisconsin represents 186,000 families who could use these tax credits to lower the costs of their health insurance.
Tax Credits for Small Businesses. The health reform law provides tax credits to small businesses worth up to 35% of the cost of providing health insurance. Freshman Rep. Michael G. Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania represents up to 18,100 small businesses that are eligible for this tax credit. Repeal would force these small businesses to drop coverage or bear the full costs of coverage themselves.
Funding for Retiree Coverage. The health reform law provides funding to encourage employers to continue to provide health insurance for their retirees. Freshman Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler from Washington represents 11,900 early retirees who could benefit from this assistance. Repeal would increase costs for the employers in the district and jeopardize the coverage their retirees are receiving.
Coverage of the Uninsured. When fully implemented, the health reform law will extend coverage to 32 million uninsured Americans. Freshmen Rep. Daniel Webster from Florida represents a district in which over 100,000 uninsured individuals would gain coverage under the health reform law.
Hospital Savings. The health reform law benefits hospitals by covering more Americans and thereby reducing the cost of providing care to the uninsured. Repeal would undo this benefit. In the district of Freshman Rep. Charles Bass from New Hampshire, this would increase the cost of uncompensated care by $48 million annually for hospitals in the district.
The examples above illustrate the kind of benefits the health reform law provides in districts represented by freshmen members. But similar benefits occur in all of our districts. In Rep. Waxman’s district, 53,000 residents purchase insurance through the individual market and would lose protection against rescissions if the health care law was repealed; almost 12,000 seniors would be forced to pay more for prescription drugs under Medicare. In Rep. Pallone’s district, repeal would mean eliminating health care tax credits for up to 18,200 small businesses and 117,000 families.
The report for your district will explain the specific benefits the new law provides for your constituents. We hope this information is useful to you as you consider how to vote on repeal of health reform.
Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
Frank Pallone, Jr.
Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
9:43 a.m. | Updated
View the original article here
This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.
Twitter
Facebook